Abstract

Since antiquity, political philosophy has been occupied with basic human capacities, dividing them into three main realms: work, action. and intellect. The definition and aims of these capacities, as well as their relation to the main human virtues, were elaborated in Aristotle’s Ethics. This work is a starting point of a long tradition of reflection on the human condition. Its further development was incorporated by Hannah Arendt into her more-modernized political theory. Following Aristotle, Arendt defines two main spheres: vita activa and vita contemplativa. An attempt to redefine the main terms of this tradition was made by an Italian political philosopher, Paolo Virno, who combines it with Marxism. For this, Virno turned to Arendt’s political thought. He follows the central idea that the ability of action is connected with speech and has a virtuosic character. However, in his perception of Arendt’s theory Virno tries to blur the boundaries between other concepts of her political philosophy. The goals of this article are to explore the ways that the reception of Arendt’s ideas has shaped Virno’s political thought, and to analyze how his approach is able to cope with the main problems that she poses in her political theory. In his interpretation of Arendt’s political thought, Virno tries to redefine the distinctions that she draws, and to combine the spheres of praxis, intellect, and work. According to the author of this paper, this strategy does not always succeed in accurately covering all aspects of Arendt’s political thought.

Highlights

  • The main political treatise by Virno is called The Grammar of the Multitude

  • Virno is more likely to say that it is the work experience itself that is changing: by creating work, we can get the experience of political action where the experience of intellectual reflection is added, which does not withdraw a person from this world, and does not detach him from common affairs

  • Virno considers Arendt’s theory to be an expression of a long tradition of political thought which originated with Aristotle. This tradition, which describes the relationship between work, action, and intellect, has nowadays become the common pattern of thought

Read more

Summary

Artur Tretyak

Political philosophy has been occupied with basic human capacities, dividing them into three main realms: work, action. and intellect. Is not necessary to read Aristotle to be aware of this: “Labor, Action, Intellect: in the style of a tradition which goes back to Aristotle and which has been revisited with particular efficacy and passion by Hannah Arendt (The Human Condition), this tri-partitioning has seemed clear, realistic, nearly unquestionable It has put down solid roots in the realm of common sense: it is not a question, of an undertaking which is only philosophical, but of a widely shared pattern of thought” (Virno, 2004: 50). Virno makes a sharp turn in relation to Arendt’s thought His analysis of modernity convinces him that work, action, and intellect are not located in different spheres, and can form a unified experience. As a part of our work, it is necessary to see how Arendt makes the most important distinctions in her philosophy and builds a hierarchy of relations between work, action, and intellect, and to examine this hierarchy being turned over in the political theory of Paolo Virno

The Social and the Political
The Three Capacities of Active Life
The Virtuoso Nature of the Worker
Contemplation and Thinking
Social or Public Intellect?
Concluding Remarks
Артур Третьяк
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.