Abstract
This study examines libel litigation in the late nineteenth century and compares it to the libel climate in the late twentieth century. Libel reports in trade journals from 1884 to 1899 were surveyed and catalogued. The strongest similarity found is the frequent use of libel law by public figures and public officials. In both periods public persons sued over articles concerning public performance even though the likelihood of winning large damage awards was minimal. This finding suggests that minor changes in modern libel doctrine will not resolve current conflicts in libel law.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.