THE LIAR’S PARADOX –A WILD INTERATION. PART II. DIFTHONG «ARISTOTEL-ANOKHIN» (CONTINUATION)

Abstract

There are more and more precedents with offended infants of 30-40 years old — they are not emotionally abstinent, because they are in an artificial coma of infantilism, in which ‘desire’ has replaced ‘sacrifice’, and are clearly hypocritical, which is why the Holiday of Disobedience, hanging around the planet with a blinking garland of conflicts and wars, creates a turbulent zone in which the bifurcation points are taken out — beyond the orbit of common understanding, turning Consciousness into the quietest Sphinx, producing hypotheses. The saying, willingly or unwittingly, can become a “winged missile” — and destroy the whole world, good or bad, but the theory created by the presentiment of scientific research can help keep it in health and in the flesh of a divine plan, but on one condition: while maintaining peace and the will of Consciousness — the indispensable parity of the Mind, which multiplies both entities and doubt as paradox, whose mental albatrosses format our understanding. Thus, a hypothesis based on a paradox forms the Image of the Concept, and thereby builds a fundamental frame of the worldview, without belittling the elephants, and without forgetting the whale. In our world, a liar as Caesar’s wife turns out to be beyond suspicion, and, therefore, discussion, and his figure is so transparent and nano-technological that it has long been soldered into the ‘scale of errors’ of all perception — and this is the toothless sperm whale that substituted its back for the pillars of thinking, which is why not only looms as a wise turtle, but is also perceived by a cheerful Buddha. From time to time, the whale opens its mouth — and we all find ourselves in its throat, and the liar himself is outside the Law, outside the conflict, but in the Law: in the legal field of the Absolute, who knows only the doctrine of exclusiveness and the purple of shamelessness is accustomed.