Abstract

Different food security (FS) indicators were used to determine the level of FS on all dimensions of FS in the informal settlement areas of the Western Cape Metropole in South Africa. With regards to food access, 78% of households are severely food insecure, while just more than 50% of households earn more than the US$ 2 per capita per day food poverty line and with 21% of the households that fall below the critical point of US$ 1.25 per capita per day. The average total household expenditure on food is R338.26, whereto the share of income spent is an average of 52.5% of household income. Households experience 4.3 hungry months during a year, meaning challenges are experienced concerning food availability. The household diet diversity score (HDDS) was used to measure utilisation and it was found that 10.4 out of 18 different food groups/categories were consumed. Most significant differences can be seen for FS indicators between areas, but no significant differences were measured between farming and non-farming households. This means that households involved in farming are not more food secure than those not involved in farming. Bonteheuwel and Kraaifontein were the two areas most severely affected by food insecurity according to Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS), Household Diet Diversity Score (HDDS) as well as Months of Adequate Household Food Provisioning (MAHFP) and the food poverty measures. Gugulethu and Khayelitsha on the other hand seem to be the most food secure of all these areas. Keywords: Urban households, food security, food security indicators, food security measures, Farmer Support and Development, extension services

Highlights

  • According to Frayne, Pendleton, Crush, Acquah, Battersby-Lennard, Bras and Zanamwe (2010), urban food security (FS) is about the amount of food produced or supplied

  • According to the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) scale, it was calculated that 78% of households over all the informal settlement areas surveyed in the Cape Town Metropole experience severe food insecurity

  • Non-farming households scored 14.1 and urban farmers 13.5 on the HFIAS scale. This is an indication that urban farmers are more food secure than households not involved in agricultural activity, no significant difference were found between the FS levels between urban farming households and non-farming households

Read more

Summary

Introduction

According to Frayne, Pendleton, Crush, Acquah, Battersby-Lennard, Bras and Zanamwe (2010), urban FS is about the amount of food produced or supplied. Hendriks (2015) described food insecurity as a problem with multiple manifestations. Factors contributing to this challenge include social norms, individual behaviour and stages in the human life cycle, food availability and quality. D’Haese, Karaan, Van Rooyen & Vink (2016) observed that there are no regularised ways of monitoring FS in South Africa since different methodologies, samples and sampling techniques are used and different aspects of FS are assessed.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call