Abstract
The scientific article represents the research of the different kinds of mistakes and the reasons and the data of the normative estimations in order to minimize the delinquency activity. The criminal law is the aggregation of the criminally management activity in the cooperation with the practical and the theory data. What often doesn’t represent the deal and the coordination this two groups. It often faces because of the fuzzy law system on Russia and the often changes in it. All of them represent huge ideas in the criminal law research, but I think the idea is not fully researched all signs of a perfect face criminal acts constituting. In connection with the above, it is important to explore the issue of criminal legal error when the wrong person evaluates the legal or factual circumstances of the crime. It should be noted that the problem of errors (in the broad sense, not only the criminal law) is beyond the scope of their study separate science (in particular, criminal law). The study of errors of human behavior pays attention to the different Sciences: psychology, economy, management, sociology, etc. No one is immune from mistakes in their behavior, and only part of the human error falls within the scope of their study of criminal law. The methods using in my dissertation are: the regulation, the compare analysis, statistics, saving. This deteriorates the governance parameters . DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n6s3p290
Highlights
Subject mistakes are traditionally referred to option confusion with a subsequent impact as the offense qualification
It is suffice to recall the situation, with the former currently in force, special fraud under article number 159.4 in the criminal code of Russia, when the error of the legislative building led to the violation of fundamental provisions in the criminal law (Harald, 2015)
By order dated December 11, 2014 N 32-P of the constitutional Court assessed the constitutionality of the provisions in article number one hundred fifty-nine point four of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation. (Criminal Law, 2015)
Summary
Subject mistakes are traditionally referred to option confusion with a subsequent impact as the offense qualification. This fact should form a more responsible approach to lawmaking, compliance and restraint the rules and preporation methods in regulatory proposals to avoid mistakes in management activity. It is suffice to recall the situation, with the former currently in force, special fraud under article number 159.4 in the criminal code of Russia, when the error of the legislative building led to the violation of fundamental provisions in the criminal law (Harald, 2015). This legislator norm has provided undue advantage in the form of commutation persons because of their belonging to a social group of entrepreneurs and employees of commercial organizations. By order dated December 11, 2014 N 32-P of the constitutional Court assessed the constitutionality of the provisions in article number one hundred fifty-nine point four of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation. (Criminal Law, 2015)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
