Abstract

The research aims to show the importance of the work of the reformer in resolving disputes، and how the reconciliation offices work in the courts and to show the strengths and weaknesses, and a suggested work in drafting the reconciliation minutes. The research divided into a preface and three sections، the introduction was in the definition of the reformer and the nature of reconciliation, the first topic is in the legal and jurisprudential provisions of the reformer, and the second topic is in the obligations and rights of the reformer, and the third topic is in the practical reality of the work of the reformer in the courts. The research concluded at the end of several results, including: that the reformer is the one who undertakes the reconciliation work in accordance with the provisions of the organization of the reconciliation center, and he has many obligations and rights that the organizer cares about، and the reconciliation process goes through several stages starting with the referral stage and ending with the stage of issuing the reconciliation report, which has three pictures in The system is: the non-composition report، the partial composition report, and the total composition report, and all of these minutes contain several elements required by the regulator. The researcher suggested some proposals, the most important of which are: holding training courses for reformers, evaluating them by expert reformers, making more modeling and reviewing them by experts in this field.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call