Abstract
One year before he argued Homer Plessy’s case before the Supreme Court, Albion W. Tourgée wrote, “Citizenship in the abstract is the most comprehensive, complex, difficult and important of human relations, and American citizenship is especially complex in its character and relations.” This essay explores those complexities by cross-examining three Supreme Court cases decided within five years of one another—Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark (1898), and Downes v. Bidwell (1901)—with works of literature by Tourgée, Charles W. Chesnutt, and Thomas Dixon. The essay makes no claim to resolve the complexities it describes. But it does point to how those complexities, arising during this era of segregation, imperial expansion, and Chinese exclusion, remain with us today.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
