Abstract

IntroductionChanging the way we make decisions from one environment to another allows us to maintain optimal decision-making. One way decision-making may change is how biased one is toward one option or another. Identifying the regions of the brain that underlie the change in bias will allow for a better understanding of flexible decision-making.MethodsAn event-related, perceptual decision-making task where participants had to detect a picture of an animal amongst distractors was used during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Positive and negative financial motivation were used to affect a change in response bias, and changes in decision-making behavior were quantified using signal detection theory.ResultsResponse bias became relatively more liberal during both positive and negative motivated trials compared to neutral trials. For both motivational conditions, the larger the liberal shift in bias, the greater the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) activity. There was no relationship between individuals' belief that they used a different strategy and their actual change in response bias.ConclusionsThe present findings suggest that the left IFG plays a role in adjusting response bias across different decision environments. This suggests a potential role for the left IFG in flexible decision-making.

Highlights

  • Changing the way we make decisions from one environment to another allows us to maintain optimal decision-making

  • This region met the two criteria we established a priori: BOLD activity correlated with the change in bias from the neutral to the motivated conditions, and this relationship held true regardless of whether positive or negative motivation induced the shift in response bias

  • While the absence of such a relationship is in keeping with results from a study using a similar paradigm (Reckless et al 2013), it is contrary to other perceptual decision-making studies that suggest a positive, linear relationship between motivation and increased performance (Engelmann and Pessoa 2007; Engelmann et al 2009)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Changing the way we make decisions from one environment to another allows us to maintain optimal decision-making. Changes in the decision criterion and the corresponding level of sensory evidence required before a stimulus is judged to be present allow for flexible decision-making (Green and Swets 1966; Bogacz et al 2006; Ratcliff and McKoon 2008). As behavior, such as approaching a potential reward or avoiding potential danger, follows from the decisions we make, flexible decision-making can lead to flexible behavior.

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.