Abstract

Constitutions of democratic republics legitimize political government with an appeal to the sovereignty of the people. In the beginning there is the thesis that the people or rather the population from which emanates all governing power is a sovereign. The thoughts on people's sovereignty fit seamlessly in a concept of democracy with at least two different layers of meaning as restrained and unrestrained forms of political self-determination. It is obvious that libertarian regime and protectionist regime have different effects on societal learning processes and democratic experimentalism. The libertarian regime leans toward an unconditional preference for openness, accepting that coincidence is worthy to decide our destiny. The protectionists want to avoid too risky or unacceptable coincidences. With regard to the institutions and the practice of the 'militant democracy' in Germany one may discern three prominent paradigms, of interpretation and justification: anti-extremist paradigm; anti-National Socialist paradigm; and civil society paradigm.Keywords:anti-extremist paradigm; anti-National Socialist paradigm; civil society paradigm; Germany; learning sovereign; libertarian regime; militant democracy; protectionist regime

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.