Abstract

ABSTRACT This article offers a discussion of some advantages and disadvantages afforded by the format collaborators chose to create and launch the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition (LCHC) Polyphonic Autobiography. It is divided into three sections: first, I review research on alternative modes of publishing, peer production as a public good, and the pros and cons of tradeoffs and social filtering processes. Second, I connect themes in that conversation 1) to the LCHC Polyphonic Autobiography creators’ decision to use a web-based format for the project and 2) to the multiple audiences, goals, and interests the resource serves. Third, I end with conclusions and lingering questions about how and by whom the LCHC Polyphonic Autobiography will be used.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call