Abstract

This paper presents the syntactic dimension of ditransitive verbs in terms of the universal theory of Role and Reference Grammar (RRG). This theory is syntactic in nature, but it also covers the semantic as well as the pragmatic aspects of any linguistic phenomenon. It assumes a universal framework through which syntactic constructions can be analyzed. However, the morphological structure that each language enjoys renders the universal treatment more complicated and can question the universal nature of such a theory. In this paper, an attempt is made to check if the universal tenet of the theory is maintained over two typologically different languages: English and Arabic in respect of the way that double-object constructions (DOCs) are represented in the theory. A limitation is made to answer these questions: does the rich morphological nature of Arabic affect the universality of RRG in so far as Layered Structure of the Clause (LSC) is concerned? and; where and how does the information about tense is represented in both languages? The results show that this theory is indeed universal when it deals with a syntactic phenomenon like DOCs and that a separate projection is dedicated to represent some related information about the clause and this is concluded from the analysis of the selected data.

Highlights

  • Ditransitive verbs are regarded as verbs that have two objects, one direct and the other is indirect

  • The first object is regarded as the indirect object (IO) and the second object is regarded as the direct object (DO) [1]

  • We have argued that the universal tenet of Reference Grammar (RRG) is maintained in so far as the syntactic representation of the double-object constructions (DOCs) is concerned

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ditransitive verbs are regarded as verbs that have two objects, one direct and the other is indirect. The first object is regarded as the indirect object (IO) and the second object is regarded as the direct object (DO) [1] These objects indicate a meaning that is related to the action referred to by the verbs. In other words, these objects add further information to complete the meaning indicated by the ditransitive verbs. These objects add further information to complete the meaning indicated by the ditransitive verbs This relatioship is captured in logical structures. They represent the lexical decomposition of the verbs. These logical structures are based on the class that the verb belongs to.

Literature Review
The analysis of English dtata
The analysis of Arabic data
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.