The law is just the law: analysing the definition of corruption in Zimbabwe

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to highlight the shortfalls of the legal definition of corruption in Zimbabwe.Design/methodology/approachDefining corruption is a universal challenge. Thus, in reviewing Zimbabwes definition, this paper also draws on other common law system jurisdictions based on English traditions and Sharia law to make a comparative analysis. The paper also takes a multi-disciplinary approach that transcend fields of law and anthropology.FindingsAlthough criminal law can be used as the normative basis in the fight against corruption, it can also be used by the powerful to shield themselves from corruption, through its indeterminacy and interpretation. Be this as it may, real and firm law can assist in curbing the vice.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper’s purview is limited both in terms of subject and scope. Although it starts by considering the definition of corruption to get a broad overview of this subject, it mainly focuses on the meaning of two popular concepts that are popularly identified with our understanding of corruption – abuse of power and public office.Originality/valueThe paper tries to establish a framework for understanding and curbing corruption through the use of statutory law.