Abstract

Section 162 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 introduces a novel provision into our law in that it empowers a broad range of persons to apply to the court to declare a director delinquent in certain circumstances. The effect of a declaration of a person as delinquent is that he is disqualified, for the duration of the order, from being a director of a company.In Lewis Group Limited v Woollam (2017 (2) SA 547 (WCC)) the Western Cape High Court was faced with an application brought by Lewis Group Limited in terms of section 165(3) of the Companies Act for an order setting aside a demand served on it by a shareholder, Mr David Woollam on the ground that it was frivolous, vexatious or without merit. Woollam wished to rely on the derivative action to require Lewis Group Limited to commence proceedings to declare four of its directors delinquent under section 162 of the Companies Act. The main question before the court was whether, under the Companies Act, a shareholder might institute proceedings to declare a director delinquent under section 162 of the Companies Act using the derivative action. The court, per Binns-Ward J, held that this may not be done and that the application must be instituted in terms of section 162 of the Companies Act. This note critically analyses the judgment and evaluates whether the court came to the correct decision.

Highlights

  • In Lewis Group Limited v Woollam (2017 (2) SA 547 (WCC)) the Western Cape High Court was faced with an application brought by Lewis Group Limited in terms of section 165(3) of the Companies Act for an order setting aside a demand served on it by a shareholder, Mr David Woollam on the ground that it was frivolous, vexatious or without merit

  • Woollam wished to rely on the derivative action to require Lewis Group Limited to commence proceedings to declare four of its directors delinquent under section 162 of the Companies Act

  • The court held that in any case there was no merit in Woollam’s demand to have the four directors of Lewis Group Limited declared delinquent because, due to insufficient evidence, he had failed to prove that the conduct of the directors in question fell within the scope of section 162(5)(c) of the Companies Act

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The effect of a declaration of a person as delinquent is that he is disqualified, for the duration of the order, from being a director of a company (s 69(8)(a) of the Companies Act). In Lewis Group Limited v Woollam (2017 (2) SA 547 (WCC)) (hereinafter “Lewis Group v Woollam”) the Western Cape High Court was faced with an application brought by Lewis Group Limited in terms of section 165(3) of the Companies Act for an order setting aside a demand served on it by a shareholder, Mr David Woollam (hereinafter “Woollam”) on the ground that it was frivolous, vexatious or without merit. This note critically analyses the judgment and evaluates whether the court came to the correct decision

The facts
Analysis and discussion
The exception laid down by the court
Good faith and the danger of abuse of section
Consideration of foreign legislation
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call