Abstract

The latitudinal diversity gradient has been considered a consequence of a shift in the impact of abiotic and biotic factors that limit species distributions from the poles to the equator, thus influencing species richness variation. It has also been considered the outcome of evolutionary processes that vary over geographical space. We used six South American mammal groups to test the association of environmental and evolutionary factors and the ecological structuring of mammal assemblages with spatial variation in taxonomic richness (TR), at a spatial resolution of 110 km x 110 km, at tropical and extra-tropical latitudes. Based on attributes that represent what mammal species do in ecosystems, we estimated ecological diversity (ED) as a mean pairwise ecological distance between all co-occurring taxa. The mean pairwise phylogenetic distance between all co-occurring taxa (AvPD) was used as an estimation of phylogenetic diversity. Geographically Weighted Regression analyses performed separately for each mammal group identified tropical and extra-tropical high R2 areas where environmental and evolutionary factors strongly accounted for richness variation. Temperature was the most important predictor of TR in high R2 areas outside the tropics, as was AvPD within the tropics. The proportion of TR variation accounted for by environment (either independently or combined with AvPD) was higher in tropical areas of high richness and low ecological diversity than in tropical areas of high richness and high ecological diversity. In conclusion, we confirmed a shift in the impact of environmental factors, mainly temperature, that best account for mammal richness variation in extra-tropical regions, whereas phylogenetic diversity best accounts for richness variation within the tropics. Environment in combination with evolutionary history explained the coexistence of a high number of ecologically similar species within the tropics. Consideration of the influence of contemporary environmental variables and evolutionary history is crucial to understanding of the latitudinal diversity gradient.

Highlights

  • The Dobzhansky-MacArthur hypothesis [1,2,3] envisages the latitudinal diversity gradient as the consequence of a shift in the impact of abiotic and biotic factors that limit species distributions from the poles to the equator

  • To further analyse differences in the explanatory capacity of the environment to account for taxonomic richness (TR) variation across tropical areas, we evaluated whether climatic variability and topographic heterogeneity were higher in high TR-low ecological diversity (ED) areas than in high TR-high ED areas

  • We found a greater overall effect of TEMP (Zr = 1.45), PREC (Zr = -0.54) and ALTstd (Zr = 0.35) on TR across extra-tropical high R2 areas than across tropical high R2 areas where overall environmental effects ranged from Zr = 0.06 to 0.21

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Dobzhansky-MacArthur hypothesis (hereafter DMH) [1,2,3] envisages the latitudinal diversity gradient as the consequence of a shift in the impact of abiotic and biotic factors that limit species distributions from the poles to the equator. A second proposition of the DMH is that high temperature promotes faster biotic interactions and higher rates of evolution and coevolutionary adaptations in the tropics than in temperate regions [5,6] This suggests that the latitudinal diversity gradient may be the outcome of evolutionary processes that vary over geographic space (e.g., [7,8]), and there is some evidence to indicate that diversification rates are faster within the tropics (e.g., [8,9,10], but see [11,12]).

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call