Abstract
Abstract: The issue of the nature of the transition from the Late Neolithic to the Early Chalcolithic at Teleilat Ghassul is re-examined in this article. A stratigraphic review of all work at the site suggests a new equivalencing between Hennessy’s ten-phase (A+-I) and the traditional Pontifical Biblical Institute (PBI) five-level (I-IVB) division. It is suggested that no PBI excavation (Mallon, Koeppel, North) sampled Hennessy’s Neolithic phase H-I assemblages. Once the PBI material is set to one side, a detailed comparison between Hennessy’s Neolithic (phase H-I) and Early Chalcolithic (phase G-F) assemblages is undertaken. Architecture is sharply contrasted, but more nuanced views of the ceramic, lithic and ecofactual assemblages emerge. The Late Neolithic assemblages are closely to be identified with earlier Neolithic norms, whereas the Early Chalcolithic assemblages display all the hallmarks of the later Classic Ghassulian culture. Radiometric data old and new is then considered, with the result that the old high dates for the Ghassul Neolithic are set aside, and a new “low” chronology proposed, based on recent short-life samples. Finally, in the light of the considerable differences between the Late Neolithic and Early Chalcolithic assemblages, we raise anew the question of Ghassulian origins.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.