Abstract
Background: A trend in the NIBS literature is to assess the efficacy of an intervention using a responder analysis whereby participants are di- or trichotomised in order that they may be classified as either responders or non-responders. Yet, responder analyses in the clinical medicine and psychology literature have been criticised by methodologists. A major criticism has been the susceptibility to false positive (Type I errors).
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
