Abstract
The terms 'impartiality' and, more particularly, 'impartial', play an important, if curiously under-researched role in party-political discourse during the period 1680-1745. This is the period that witnessed the birth of political parties in England, following the bitter ideological divisions of the English Civil War and restored monarchy of Charles II in 1660. Recent studies of the language which the Whigs and Tories used to try to prove their non-partisanship have focused on their rival efforts to appropriate key terms such as 'patriot', 'patriotism', 'country party', 'national interest' and 'public spirit'. The political rhetoric of patriotism is analogous to, and in some ways related to, rhetoric of impartiality. Patriotism exploits emotional attachments, and impartiality presupposes neutrality and detachment from the passions. Both the 'patriot' and the 'impartial' claim to be able to rise above the narrow and partisan demands of political immediacy, to see things from a larger and longer perspective. Keywords: Charles II; emotional attachments; England; English Civil War; impartiality; party-political discourse; patriotism
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.