Abstract
The impacts that the landscape generates and the problems it poses to the economy, both theoretically and empirically, are treated (often indirectly) in some of the essays contained here. This article summarizes these issues by first of all highlighting how the «landscape good» poses problems to the concept itself of economic rationality of the mainstream economic theory andhow it is not easily treatable even in the context of Cost and Benefit Analysis (CBA) which aims to give algorithmic concreteness to the principle of rationality. To use a different concept of rationality and, consequently, to use algorithms that differ from those of the CBA is proposed. The solution of determining the economic value of the landscape and its impact on market values, of the redistribution of the revenues it generates comes fromthe Italian legislation deferred to the Landscape Plan. The evidence of the experiments carried out shows that this Plan, to be incisive, must be modified in the contents and above all in the processes that define it. Without a strong participation of the communities in its definition and management, the Plan will not be able to preserve the «landscape good» from all those who would like to bend its uses to their interests.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.