Abstract

The LACE+ (Length of stay, Acuity of admission, Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI] score, and Emergency department [ED] visits in the past 6 mo) index risk-prediction tool has never been successfully tested in a neurosurgery population. To assess the ability of LACE+ to predict adverse outcomes after supratentorial brain tumor surgery. LACE+ scores were retrospectively calculated for all patients (n=624) who underwent surgery for supratentorial tumors at the University of Pennsylvania Health System (2017-2019). Confounding variables were controlled with coarsened exact matching. The frequency of unplanned hospital readmission, ED visits, and death was compared for patients with different LACE+ score quartiles (Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4). A total of 134 patients were matched between Q1 and Q4; 152 patients were matched between Q2 and Q4; and 192 patients were matched between Q3 and Q4. Patients with higher LACE+scores were significantly more likely to be readmitted within 90 d (90D) of discharge for Q1 vs Q4 (21.88%vs 46.88%, P=.005) and Q2 vs Q4 (27.03%vs 55.41%, P=.001). Patients with larger LACE+scores also had significantly increased risk of 90D ED visits for Q1 vs Q4 (13.33%vs 30.00%, P=.027) and Q2 vs Q4 (22.54%vs 39.44%, P=.039). LACE+score also correlated with death within 90D of surgery for Q2 vs Q4 (2.63%vs 15.79%, P=.003) and with death at any point after surgery/during follow-up for Q1 vs Q4 (7.46%vs 28.36%, P=.002), Q2 vs Q4 (15.79%vs 31.58%, P=.011), and Q3 vs Q4 (18.75%vs 31.25%, P=.047). LACE+ may be suitable for characterizing risk of certain perioperative events in a patient population undergoing supratentorial brain tumor resection.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.