The labour input associated with calf care on Irish dairy farms

Abstract

The objective of this study was to quantify the overall labour requirement for calf care and how it is influenced by enterprise scale and facilities, together with an evaluation of specific calf-feeding systems with respect to labour requirement and calf performance. One hundred and twenty nine spring-calving dairy herds participated in the investigation of overall labour input. Herds were categorized into three groups depending on herd size (small = < 50 cows, medium = 50 to 80 cows, large = > 80 cows). The total average time consumed by calf care per farm increased ( P < 0.01) with herd size and the average time consumed per calf was highest in the small herd group (2.1 min/day). The proportion of farms bucket feeding was lower ( P < 0.05) and the proportion feeding calves ad libitum and using cold milk was higher ( P < 0.05) with the large group compared to the small herd group. Fifty-seven of the 129 herds participated in the measurement of labour input associated with specific calf-feeding systems. The labour input time per calf required for the task of milk feeding tended ( P = 0.08) to be longer when calves were fed twice daily, using buckets or teats compared to automatic feeders, once daily feeding with teats and twice daily feeding with a trough. The labour input per calf for the cleaning of milk feeding equipment and for bedding and cleaning calf pens was greater ( P < 0.05) with automatic feeding systems compared to the other feeding systems. A further sub-set of ten herds (from the 57 herds) underwent calf performance measurements. The mean calf weight at day 77 for automatic feeding, once daily feeding, twice daily feeding with teats and twice daily feeding with troughs was 95, 95, 93, 91 kg, respectively. In conclusion, labour input associated with calf care was influenced by herd size (and indirectly calf number), and calf-feeding system. Milk feeding of calves on a once daily basis tended to reduce the total labour input per calf and did not adversely affect calf performance. Thus, it is possible to improve efficiency of calf care by selecting time efficient methods of calf-feeding without affecting calf performance.