The Korean Peninsula Peace Regime: How to Build It

Abstract

A Korean peninsula peace regime has not yet been established, over a half century since the Korean armistice agreement. Two approaches to a Korean peninsula peace‐regime‐building process are required: inter‐Korean and international approaches. The two Koreas should play leading roles at the inter‐Korean and international levels in inter‐Korean confidence‐building measures by reducing tension through reconciliation and economic cooperation. A Korean peace forum involving the USA, China and the two Koreas under the 19 September joint agreement could conclude a Korean peninsula peace treaty to replace the armistice agreement and a peace regime could be institutionalized by implementing the inter‐Korean basic agreement (1992) through inter‐Korean cooperation. This article proposes a comprehensive, long‐term roadmap for the Korean peninsula peace‐regime‐building process. The author makes three major arguments. First, the two Koreas and the four powers need to agree on a comprehensive roadmap for the Korean peninsula peace‐regime‐building process as suggested here. The inter‐Korean and international approaches to the peace‐regime‐building process should be considered in parallel. Second, the North Korean nuclear issue should be resolved peacefully through the Six‐Party Talks. Third, the two Koreas need to work together to find an alternative to their respective proposals. The author proposes a Korean peninsula peace treaty signed by the ROK, the DPRK, the USA and China as an alternative. Unless the two Koreas demonstrate their desire to cooperate through sincere deeds by implementing inter‐Korean agreements and are willing to make concessions by working together for establishing a peace regime in Korea, there is little chance of achieving this goal.