The Knowledge Argument, Russellian Monism, and Causal Integration

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter argues that, given plausible assumptions, the knowledge argument leads to Russellian monism. It then defends Russellian monism from Howell’s objection that the theory fails to live up to its promise to integrate consciousness into physical causation. It argues that Howell’s objection depends on dubious assumptions about the relationship between the distinctive properties the theory posits (“quiddities”) and properties described in fundamental physics—assumptions Russellian monists can reject. Finally, it considers Kind’s pessimistic charge that Russellian monism fails to move the mind-body debate forward. In response, it argues that Russellian monism moves the debate forward not by answering its central questions but rather by reframing them in potentially useful ways.