Abstract

While refugee integration is defined as a bidirectional process of mutual learning and adaptation, in practice, the U.S. resettlement program continues to emphasize refugees’ acculturation processes and places little emphasis on cultural or logistical adaptation of existing services. When adaptation does happen, it is often structured around dominant notions of health and well-being. There is a need to explore bidirectional integration processes and existing systems adaptations to accommodate people with refugee backgrounds at the institutional level. This article details a framework to build a sustainable collaboration between a refugee community and existing health and social service systems to reduce harmful alcohol use. The conceptual framework emphasizes three components: 1) adaptation of refugees’ indigenous expertise, networks, systems, and resources; 2) adaptation of existing systems to serve new groups in culturally relevant and effective ways; and 3) the participatory processes through which refugees and existing systems collaborate to achieve mutual goals. This paper describes the application of this framework and concludes with a discussion of lessons to support replication of the framework in other settings. Lessons learned include: equalizing power, paying attention to relationships and roles, engaging in deep cultural adaption of interventions, and building individual and organizational capacity to support partners.

Highlights

  • While refugee integration is defined as a bidirectional process of mutual learning and adaptation, in practice, the U.S resettlement program continues to emphasize refugees’ acculturation processes and places little emphasis on cultural or logistical adaptation of existing services

  • Since 2005, Karen people have been resettling to the United States with refugee status in large numbers

  • A large wave of Karen people began resettling to the United States with refugee status in the mid-2000s, and there are an estimated 70,000 Karen people currently living in the U.S (U.S Department of State, 2016)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

While refugee integration is defined as a bidirectional process of mutual learning and adaptation, in practice, the U.S resettlement program continues to emphasize refugees’ acculturation processes and places little emphasis on cultural or logistical adaptation of existing services. Research on the processes and outcomes of integration has focused heavily on the adaptation processes of people with refugee status, including: language acquisition, employment, social connections, and access to health care (Ager & Strang, 2008). Policies to facilitate integration almost exclusively fund programming that targets the adaptation of people with refugee backgrounds, rather than facilitating adaptation of existing services to meet the needs of new communities (Kirkwood, McKinlay, & McVittie, 2014; Strang & Ager, 2010)

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call