Abstract

Abstract. Instrumental climate records of the last centuries suffer from multiple breaks due to relocations and changes in measurement techniques. These breaks are detected by relative homogenization algorithms using the difference time series between a candidate and a reference. Modern multiple changepoint methods use a decomposition approach where the segmentation explaining most variance defines the breakpoints, while a stop criterion restricts the number of breaks. In this study a pairwise multiple breakpoint algorithm consisting of these two components is tested with simulated data for a range of signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) found in monthly temperature station datasets. The results for low SNRs obtained by this algorithm do not differ much from random segmentations; simply increasing the stop criterion to reduce the number of breaks is shown to not be helpful. This can be understood by considering that, in case of multiple breakpoints, even a random segmentation can explain about half of the break variance. We derive analytical equations for the explained noise and break variance for random and optimal segmentations. From these we conclude that reliable break detection at low but realistic SNRs needs a new approach. The problem is relevant because the uncertainty of the trends of individual stations is shown to be climatologically significant also for these small SNRs. An important side result is a new method to determine the break variance and the number of breaks in a difference time series by studying the explained variance for random break positions. We further discuss the changes from monthly to annual scale which increase the SNR by more than a factor of 3.

Highlights

  • Relocations of climate stations or changes in measurement techniques and procedures are known to cause breaks in climate records

  • These breaks are detected by relative homogenization algorithms using the difference time series between a candidate and a reference

  • In this study a pairwise multiple breakpoint algorithm consisting of these two components is tested with simulated data for a range of signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) found in monthly temperature station datasets

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Relocations of climate stations or changes in measurement techniques and procedures are known to cause breaks in climate records. Venema: The joint influence of break and noise variance tion, follows, where detected breaks of the difference time series are assigned to one of the involved stations. HOME recommended five homogenization methods: ACMANT (Domonkos, 2011), PRODIGE (Caussinus and Mestre, 2004), MASH (Szentimrey, 2007, 2008), PHA, and Craddock These methods have in common that they have been designed to take the inhomogeneity of the reference into account, either by using a pairwise approach (PRODIGE, PHA, Craddock) or by carefully selecting the series for the composite reference (ACMANT, MASH). 7 we use this range and derive theoretically why we expect that the break search method must fail for low SNRs. In Sect.

The observations and the method to build pairs
Estimation of the trend errors due to breaks in real data
The break search method used
Break and noise variance
Noise variance
Break variance
Estimation of the break variance
What may go wrong in the break detection process?
Skill of the search method
Comparison of the applied search method with random segmentations
Higher SNRs
Yearly and monthly resolution
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call