Abstract

Violence in the workplace and its health consequences still represent one of the main obstacles to obtaining decent working conditions. In particular, blue-collar workers run a greater risk of experiencing episodes of violence, also because of a lack of autonomy and fewer social interactions. According to the work environment hypothesis, factors such as high workload, lack of social support and lack of job control represent the antecedents of workplace bullying. Following the job demand-control-support model (JDCS), violence can be the symptom of a high-strain environment. Moreover, it is still unclear if workplace bullying can mediate the effects of work-related stress on workers’ health outcomes. The aim of the present study is to analyse the relationship between the components of the JDCS and the health of the workers considering workplace bullying as a mediating variable. By a cross sectional study design, we tested the following theoretical hypotheses: first, JDCS components (conceptualized as stress) are supposed to significantly predict the level of workers’ health. Second, workplace bullying is supposed to mediate the relationship between the JDCS components and the level of health. The sample consists of 400 blue-collars from three different Italian companies. Work-related stress, health outcomes and workplace bullying were measured by specific self-administered questionnaires and the relationships between the variables of interest were tested through a structural equation model (SEM) analysis. The results showed that while the direct relationship between the components of the JDCS and the level of psychological health is weaker (standardized path coefficients SPC = 0.21), the partial mediation hypothesis shows that workplace bullying mediate the relationship between JDCS components and health outcomes (χ2/df ratio = 2.70; path from stress to workplace bullying SPC = 0.78; path from workplace bullying to general health SPC = 0.51; p = 0.01). The JDCS components (workload, lack of control, lack of support) are useful predictors for workplace bullying. On the other hand, bullying plays a mediating role between the stress experienced and the health consequences. The present study adds new insights into the relationship between violence seen as a form of social behavioural strain and the psychological health of workers. The theoretical and practical implications are discussed. Future research on blue-collars could use longitudinal designs in order to analyse the relationship between social environment, job design and strain reactions.

Highlights

  • In a climate characterized by continuous social, political and technological evolutions, working conditions are one of the topics of greatest concern

  • Work-related stress, health outcomes and workplace bullying were measured by specific self-administered questionnaires and the relationships between the variables of interest were tested through a structural equation model (SEM) analysis

  • The results showed that while the direct relationship between the components of the job demand-control-support model (JDCS) and the level of psychological health is weaker, the partial mediation hypothesis shows that workplace bullying mediate the relationship between JDCS components and health outcomes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In a climate characterized by continuous social, political and technological evolutions, working conditions are one of the topics of greatest concern. Only recently scholars have applied the JDCS model to the study of workplace bullying, identifying this phenomenon as a form of social strain This interpretation hypothesizes the existence of a link between stressful working conditions and behaviours that can, in turn, affect health [23]. Based on the work environment hypothesis this study aims to analyse the relationship between the components of JDCS conceptualized as stress and the consequences on the health of the workers, using violence in the workplace as a mediating variable in a sample of blue-collars. We used the JDCS model for two reasons This model provides an testable theoretical framework and a list of antecedents consistent with the environmental hypothesis of violence [16] this model allows to study a type of social strain such as violence, in response to high pressure work environments. What seems to be missing in the study of strain reactions is the analysis of social-behavioural outcomes (e.g., violence) [20]

Work Environment Hypothesis
Aims and Hypotheses
Participants and Procedure
Work-Related Stress Assessment
Negative Actions Assessment
Psychological Health Assessment
Statistical Analysis
Results
Limitations and Future Research
Practical Implications
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call