The Japan‐multimodal intervention trial for prevention of dementia (J‐MINT): a multi‐center, randomized, 18‐month controlled trial

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe Japan‐multimodal intervention trial for prevention of dementia (J‐MINT) aimed to examine the efficacy of the multi‐domain intervention in the prevention of cognitive decline in older adults at high risk of dementia.MethodThe J‐MINT is an 18‐month, multi‐centered, randomized controlled trial. Participants aged 65‐85 years with mild cognitive deficits were recruited and randomized into multi‐domain intervention (management of vascular risk factors, group‐based physical exercise, nutritional counseling, and cognitive training) and control groups (health‐related information in writing every 2 months) at a 1:1 allocation ratio using the dynamic allocation method. The primary outcome was a change from baseline to 18‐month follow‐up in a composite Z score combining several neuropsychological tests, which include tests of global cognitive function (MMSE); memory (Logical memory I and II subset of the Wechsler Memory Scale‐Revised and the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test); attention (Digit Span); executive function/processing speed (Trail Making Test, Digit Symbol Substitution Test, and Letter word fluency test).ResultBetween November 26, 2019, and December 28, 2020, 1677 participants were screened and 531 were randomly assigned to the multi‐domain intervention group (n = 265) or control group (n = 266). Four hundred and three (75.9%) participants completed the trial. The full analysis set included 433 patients who received the intervention program/health‐related information at least once. In the primary efficacy analysis, there were no significant differences in the change of composite Z score between the intervention group and the control group (mean difference 0.047 [95% CI ‐0.029 to 0.124]). In the analysis for each neuropsychological test, the score of the letter word fluency test in the intervention group significantly improved by a mean of 0.827 (95% CI = 0.356 to 1.298) points, whereas the mean difference between the intervention group and control group was not significant (mean difference 0.625 [95% CI ‐0.039 to 1.289]). In subgroup analyses, the intervention effect on composite Z score was significant among older adults with the apolipoprotein‐E (APOE) ε4 allele (mean difference 0.164 [95% CI 0.011 to 0.317]).ConclusionThe multi‐domain intervention showed significant efficacy for the prevention of cognitive decline among Japanese older adults with the APOE ε4 allele.