Abstract
Linguistic interpretation of dead language texts is frequently beset by the problem of separating bona fide linguistic characteristics from pseudo-linguistic stylizations (Schematisierung) at the hand of redactors and scribes. This paper examines two instances of putatively abnormal morphophonology, and attempts to decide on the basis of purely linguistic criteria whether or not Schematisierung is likely. The results are checked briefly against extra-linguistic evidence. The paper utilizes Aramaic texts of the Onkelos and Jonathan Targums to exemplify two diametrical cases of such application of linguistic theory: (1) The isolation of pseudo-Aramaic vowel lengthening, attributable to stylizing on the basis of Hebrew. This case is adjudged to be Schematisierung, since the conditions for the relevant alternation made little sense in the language affected. (2) The vindication of certain vowel alternations as bona fide Aramaic, though they have been traditionally viewed as Hebraicizing.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
