Abstract

Background The prognostic importance of the ischaemic and scar burden, and their impact on coronary heart disease (CHD) patient management is well established from single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) studies. Recently, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has been shown to have superior sensitivity for the detection of CHD compared with SPECT [1]. However, the ischaemic and the scar burden measured by CMR and SPECT have not been compared. Methods From the prospective CE-MARC study, all patients who had significant coronary artery stenosis (≥70% of a first order coronary artery or ≥50% of the left main artery) on quantitative invasive coronary angiography and ischaemia on both CMR and SPECT were selected. The summed stress score (SSS), the summed rest score (SRS) as well as the summed difference score (SDS) were assessed based on a 5-point scoring scale (0=normal; 4=severe) for perfusion defects and/or late gadolinium enhancement (LGE)

Highlights

  • The prognostic importance of the ischaemic and scar burden, and their impact on coronary heart disease (CHD) patient management is well established from single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) studies

  • The median stress score (SSS) was similar between cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and SPECT

  • The median summed rest score (SRS) was significantly lower (1.6±3.9 vs. 12.2±10.7, p

Read more

Summary

Open Access

Sven Plein1*, Bernhard A Herzog, Neil Maredia, Ananth Kidambi, Manish Motwani, Akhlaque Uddin, David P Ripley, Catherine J Dickinson, Julia Brown, Jane Nixon, Colin Everett, John P Greenwood. From 16th Annual SCMR Scientific Sessions San Francisco, CA, USA. From 16th Annual SCMR Scientific Sessions San Francisco, CA, USA. 31 January - 3 February 2013

Background
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call