Abstract

<p>Water resources are under increasing pressure, and there are tensions between increasing demand and the natural limits to potable water supply. Authorities must find solutions that fulfil societal demands without compromising environmental integrity. As one way to counteract water deficits, desalination has evolved as an attractive solution. This technology is contested and associated with a variety of social, environmental and economic consequences; yet it is increasingly used. In Sweden, the technology is rare but recent droughts have spurred interest. On the island of Gotland, where Sweden's first larger desalination plant was inaugurated in 2016, we examine the perceived benefits and drawbacks of desalination as well as the decision-making process that led up to its implementation. Through qualitative analysis of public documents and stakeholder interviews, we identify mechanisms that contributed to desalination becoming a favored solution. We find that it is associated with a number of benefits that are in line with broader development goals, against which its drawbacks are considered to be acceptable or externalized. Desalination extends natural limits to permit development, delaying deeper social and economic restructuring. Rather than arguing against desalination <em>per se</em>, we emphasize the risk of the depoliticization of water supply through technocratic decision-making, the normalization of scarcity and certain technologies, and the urgency that builds around increasing water supply 'at any economic cost.' These tendencies obscure drawbacks, limitations and conflicting interests. They foreclose the questioning of resource intensive development. In order to invoke transformation towards long-term sustainability of Gotland's water supply, policy-makers should seek to diversify their sources of knowledge and encourage more open democratic debate around alternative regional development pathways.</p><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> desalination, natural limits, water scarcity, Gotland, political ecology, technocracy, depoliticization, normalization</p>

Highlights

  • Access to a sufficient amount of potable water is a prerequisite for the wellbeing of humanity, and a variety of phenomena put pressure on water resources (World Water Assessment Programme 2012)

  • The question we address is why Journal of Political Ecology

  • They feel that water supply is not considered early enough in decision-making and planning processes, making it difficult to implement what has been decided in the political sphere

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Access to a sufficient amount of potable water is a prerequisite for the wellbeing of humanity, and a variety of phenomena put pressure on water resources (World Water Assessment Programme 2012). The island of Gotland in southeastern Sweden is one such region, where recent shortages have stimulated discussions about how to safeguard water resources. These led to the opening of the Herrvik desalination plant on the island's east coast in summer 2016. The article addresses the following overarching question: why did Gotland's authorities decide to complement the island's water supply with a desalination plant, despite its known controversies? Being the first study of this kind in Sweden (and, to our knowledge, the Nordic countries) we treat it as a critical case of how desalination and similar supply-oriented solutions can gain ground in other world regions thought to be water-rich – in part as a response to climate change, but as a result of long-entrenched regional economic development pathways

Theoretical and methodological approach
The production and perpetuation of water scarcity in Gotland
Findings
Concluding discussion and recommendations

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.