Abstract

Abstract This article examines the idea of the “irreducible core” of trustee duties in relation to East Asian trusts. Although the Japanese Trust Act of 2006 has designated many duties as non-core, the extent of reduction is far from certain. This is because regulatory law continues to apply, as well as the court’s policy interest in giving effect to the trust only where this is intended by the parties. The New Zealand Trust Act of 2019, which highlights the centrality of good faith rather than self-denial, clearly identifies the duties which stand at the core of the Japanese and Chinese trusts.

Highlights

  • This article examines the idea of the “irreducible core” of trustee duties in relation to East Asian trusts

  • Japan is one of the civil law jurisdictions where the trust is the primary legal form used in commercial situations including securitisation and pensions, which contrasts with the situation in continental Europe, where sui generis solutions are usually preferred.[4]

  • Japanese court attaches primary importance to parties’ agreement where they had the opportunity to designate the appropriate level of duty Self-denial beyond good faith is not a core duty in the Japanese trust

Read more

Summary

The “irreducible core” debate

In the common law trust, trustee duties stand at the centre of the trust. As Tony Honorestresses, it is the nature of trusteeship as an office which determines whether an arrangement meets the minimum requirement to be characterised as a trust.[12]. Japan is not an exception to the problem; as Matsumoto Nobuko notes the term is used in a loose way by the Financial Services Agency in the official policy context She sees the case of Supreme Court, Heisei 28-9-6, Kinhan 1503-2 (2016) as supporting the view that legally fiduciary duty can be interpreted as the duty of care where the it is necessary to entrust property or discretion in order to obtain a particular service. Core duties include the need to know trust terms, to act in accordance with these terms, good faith, and to act for the benefit of the beneficiaries or for the purpose of the trust The lack of good faith would make the trust illusory

Core trustee duties in Japan
Duty of loyalty
Duty of care
Duty to follow the terms of the trust
Duty to supervise delegated persons
Duty of impartiality
Duty to inform beneficiaries of their beneficial interest
Duty to segregate trust property
2.10 Conclusion on core duties
Remedies against breach and gross negligence
The Chinese trust as a comparative example
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call