Abstract
In 7 lung and breast cancer patients, we investigated the location effect of external markers on the correlation between the motions of external markers and of an internal target under various breathing patterns.Our department developed a tumor tracking system consisting of two infrared cameras and a medical simulator. Using the system, we monitored the simultaneous motions of tumor and external markers placed at various locations on a patient's skin and saved the results for offline analysis. We then used a cross‐covariance approach to analyze the correlation between the motions of individual markers and of the tumor. Based on the additive model, we evaluated the predictability of tumor motion from the motions of the external markers.The effect of marker location on the correlation between the motions of the tumor and of the external markers varied widely from patient to patient. At no specific marker location did the surrogate signal consistently present superior correlation with tumor motion in 3 breathing sessions with 7 patients. When the composite external signal generated from multiple external motion signals was correlated with tumor motion, the quality of the correlation improved significantly. In most cases, the composite signal provided the best surrogate signal for correlating with tumor motion.Correlation between the motions of external markers and of a tumor may be affected by several factors, including patient characteristics, marker locations, and breathing pattern. A single external marker cannot provide sufficient and reliable tracking information for tumor motion. A composite signal generated from the motions of multiple external makers provides an excellent surrogate signal, which in this study demonstrated superior correlation with tumor motion as compared with the signal provided by an individual marker. A composite signal would be a more reliable way to track tumor motion during respiratory‐gated radiotherapy.PACS numbers: 87.53.Jw
Highlights
58 Yan et al.: Investigation of the location effect of...margin is added to the gross target volume (GTV) to yield a planning target volume (PTV) that accounts for the uncertainty
Margin is added to the gross target volume (GTV) to yield a planning target volume (PTV) that accounts for the uncertainty
The issue of organ motion has drawn wide attention in cancer treatment, and accounting for motion is important to cutting-edge treatment techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy.[1,2] When the GTV is extended to a PTV, certain regions of normal tissue are included in PTV and will potentially be treated with the full prescribed dose, possibly resulting in an increase in normal-tissue complications
Summary
58 Yan et al.: Investigation of the location effect of...margin is added to the gross target volume (GTV) to yield a planning target volume (PTV) that accounts for the uncertainty. The margin ensures that the GTV will receive the full dose prescribed, even if the PTV shifts to some extent from its planning location because of organ motion during the course of radiation therapy. As reported by Shirato[10,11,12] and Schweikard,(13,14) direct tumor tracking systems have been employed in some institutions to compensate for organ motion during adaptive radiotherapy. These techniques provide the capability to track the tumor location using implanted metal seeds and markers together with a diagnostic X-ray imaging system. Continuous X-ray imaging is necessary to track the internal target during the entire treatment period, and the total amount of radiation is significant—considerably limiting application of this technique in the clinic
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
