Abstract

The Inverse Care Law is principally concerned with the effect of market forces on health care which create inequities in access to health services through privileging individuals who possess the forms of social capital that are valued within health care settings. The fields of disaster risk reduction need to consider the ways in which inequities, driven by economic and social policy as well as institutional decision-making, create vulnerabilities prior to a disaster, which are then magnified post disaster through entrenched structural differences in access to resources. Drawing on key principles within the Inverse Care Law, the Inverse Response Law refers to the idea that people in lower socio-economic groups are more likely to be impacted and to experience disparities in service provision during the disaster response and recovery phase. In a market model of recovery, vulnerable groups struggle to compete for necessary services creating inequities in adaptive capacity as well as in social and wellbeing outcomes over time. Both the Inverse Care Law and the Inverse Response Law focus on the structural organisation of services at a macro level. In this article, the Inverse Care Law is outlined, its application to medical treatment following disasters considered and an explanation of the Inverse Response Law provided. Case studies from recent disasters, in London, New Zealand, Puerto Rico and Mexico City are examined in order to illustrate themes at work relating to the Inverse Response Law.

Highlights

  • Tudor Hart’s Inverse Care Law [1] refers to the idea that people who require the most care receive the least and to a lesser standard

  • Drawing upon the key public health principles within the Inverse Care Law, this paper proposes an Inverse Response Law that relates to the social construction of disaster risk as well as access to resources in the aftermath of a disaster event

  • The more established fields of sociology and public health have much to offer to the fledging disaster studies and emergency management disciplines

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tudor Hart’s Inverse Care Law [1] refers to the idea that people who require the most care receive the least and to a lesser standard. In the field of disaster risk reduction, consideration must be given to the ways in which inequities create vulnerabilities prior to a disaster [3] These inequities are driven by economic and social policy as well as institutional decision-making. Drawing upon the key public health principles within the Inverse Care Law, this paper proposes an Inverse Response Law that relates to the social construction of disaster risk as well as access to resources in the aftermath of a disaster event. An argument is advanced that attention to the workings of the Inverse Response Law in hazard mitigation and preparedness actions, will lead to recognition by disaster risk reduction stakeholders that communities that are socially and economically deprived prior to a disaster are most vulnerable. Targeting and resourcing a wider-ranging response could ameliorate the existing lack of basic resources, such as poorly maintained infrastructure, to build resilience and decrease dependency on governmental and NGO sectors in the aftermath of disaster

The Inverse Care Law
The Inverse Response Law
Revisiting Heatwave
Institutional Barriers Disproportionately Impacted the Poor
Disadvantaged Communities had Greater Exposure to Disaster Risk
The Impact of Policy
Findings
Discussion—Synergies across Examples and Relevance to Theory
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call