Abstract
Size varies. Small things are typically more frequent than large things. The logarithmof frequency often declines linearly with the logarithm of size. That power law relationforms one of the common patterns of nature. Why does the complexity of nature reduceto such a simple pattern? Why do things as different as tree size and enzymerate follow similarly simple patterns? Here I analyze such patterns by their invariantproperties. For example, a common pattern should not change when adding a constantvalue to all observations. That shift is essentially the renumbering of the pointson a ruler without changing the metric information provided by the ruler. A ruler isshift invariant only when its scale is properly calibrated to the pattern being measured.Stretch invariance corresponds to the conservation of the total amount of something,such as the total biomass and consequently the average size. Rotational invariancecorresponds to pattern that does not depend on the order in which underlying processesoccur, for example, a scale that additively combines the component processesleading to observed values. I use tree size as an example to illustrate how the keyinvariances shape pattern. A simple interpretation of common pattern follows. Thatsimple interpretation connects the normal distribution to a wide variety of other commonpatterns through the transformations of scale set by the fundamental invariances.
Highlights
The size of trees follows a simple pattern
The natural metric of size, Tz, relates the normal distribution to power law and exponential scaling in Figure 1A,B, when probability is plotted with respect the logarithm of the observed values, z
If we shift Tz so that it is expressed as a deviation from its minimum value, for many natural metrics, Tz, the probability pattern in equation 8 is a normal distribution with respect to the incremental scale d Tz = dRz
Summary
The size of trees follows a simple pattern. Small trees are more frequent than large trees. The natural metric of size, Tz, relates the normal distribution to power law and exponential scaling in Figure 1A,B, when probability is plotted with respect the logarithm of the observed values, z. If we shift Tz so that it is expressed as a deviation from its minimum value, for many natural metrics, Tz, the probability pattern in equation 8 is a normal distribution with respect to the incremental scale d Tz = dRz. The distribution is centered at the minimum of Tz and has average distance of fluctuations from the central location as the generalized variance, σ2. The proper way to relate general growth processes to invariant probability patterns remains an open problem
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.