The introduction of balint groups for core medical trainees – a pilot

Itunuayo Ayeni,Anne Patterson

doi:10.1192/bjo.2021.358

Abstract

AimsTo introduce and assess the impact of balint groups on core medical trainee (CMT) doctors working within an acute medical trust.BackgroundA high rate (80%) of dissatisfaction and burnout has been reported amongst trainee doctors. This has had a significant impact on recruitment with a large proportion of foundation doctors delaying their application into core specialist training. Of those already in training, up to 50% have reported taking time, out citing burnout as a cause. Balint groups are a form of reflective practice groups looking at the doctor-patient interaction. For core psychiatric trainees these groups are a mandatory part of their training.MethodWe piloted a total of three balint groups over a period of three months amongst CMT doctors based at an acute medical trust in London. A specialty registrar (ST6) in psychiatry facilitated the balint groups. Balint facilitators received supervision from a consultant psychiatrist in psychotherapy. CMT doctors were given questionnaires at the beginning of session one and emerging themes later explored. The questionnaires used were taken from the ‘Bristol Trainee-led Balint Group Scheme’.ResultThe pre-questionnaires showed that all CMT doctors surveyed believed psychological factors play an important role on patient presentation and recovery. 14/19 (74%) agreed or strongly agreed that a doctor's reaction to a patient directly influenced care. All doctors agreed or strongly agreed that it was important to reflect on a patient's emotional experience, as it was crucial to their development as a doctor.CMT doctors found balint groups useful as it provided them a space, which was not routinely offered to discuss challenging cases. Themes that emerged included a lack of support and difficulties maintaining boundaries when treating complex patients. Litigation was a recurring theme with many trainees reporting anxieties and a lack of support. Trainees reported guilt and worries that they were not doing enough for their patients. These themes appeared to have a direct impact on training experience and burnout.ConclusionWith increasing burnout and dissatisfaction amongst junior doctors, balint groups provide a unique approach to supporting junior doctors within medical specialties. The current pilot has demonstrated that CMT doctors can make use of balint groups in an effective way. We recommend that balint groups should become an integral part of specialist medical training. Psychiatrists can play a central role in supporting the health and well being of medical trainees through balint group facilitation.

Highlights

Research suggests that Black and Minority Ethnic (BAME) groups have an increased risk of involuntary psychiatric care, longer-stays within services and higher rates of re-admission
Research suggest that BAME individuals continue to experience an increased risk of involuntary psychiatric care, longer stays within secure services and higher rates of re-admission
The research which has been conducted has tended to produce inconsistent findings, in part due to the reliance on small scale studies with limited generalisability. Research within this area has been further complicated by varying definitions of culture and ethnicity across studies, leading to some suggestion that the issue of ethnic inequalities and pathways to care, has been misconceptualised. This highlights a critical need for increased research efforts to: Understand why BAME individuals are at increased risk of involuntary psychiatric care, and how this disproportionate risk can be addressed

Summary

Introduction

Based on the gaps identified we provided training sessions to a total of ∼40 staff across a number of settings. Black and minority ethnic groups and forensic mental health To review the existent literature base regarding Black and Minority Ethnic (BAME) groups care pathway into and experience of care and treatment within secure services. This includes any differences (between BAME and majority ethnic groups) in rates of sentencing, sectioning, length of stay, received treatment and use of restrictive practice.

Results

Conclusion