Abstract

In our earlier publications we proposed the possibility of using new EIM–IRMS® instrumental technique and analytical parameter δDn wine ethanol, which represents δ2H value of non-exchangeable hydrogen stable isotope ratio in ethanol, to improve detection of illegal wine production practices such as addition of sugar and/or water to grape must prior to alcoholic fermentation. This article shows a comparative performance study between EIM-IRMS® and CS-qNMR methods in order to evaluate potential and demonstrate the precision of two isotopic concepts and their degree of detection of illegal wine production practices. Three batches of laboratory wine samples were prepared from three different types of grapes (N=24 samples). Sample results obtained from both methods are compared and a statistical data processing was carried out. Based on the results obtained using the EIM-IRMS® method we detected 11 out of 21 of previously adulterated wine samples which represents a success rate of 52.4% detection of illegal practices (beet sugar, water or beet sugar syrup additions). In addition, wines from the Republic of Serbia (90 samples) were examined as well using the EIM-IRMS® method and appropriate equipment to confirm their authenticity.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call