The interrater reliability of the novel Udby classification of Modic Changes: A first estimate

Abstract

BackgroundModic change grading is heterogeneous, inconsistent, and lacks a single nomenclature across the published literature. A new method of Modic change classification has been established by Dr. Peter Udby which hopes to unify how Modic changes are classified while also adding grading of the cranial/caudal extent of the Modic change across the vertebral body from the respective endplate involved to best capture the clinically relevant information of Modic changes. MethodsTwenty magnetic resonance images of potential basivertebral nerve ablation candidates were independently reviewed by two board-certified and fellowship trained neuroradiologist and two board-certified and fellowship-trained interventional spine physiatrists for the presence and characterization of Modic changes using the newly described Udby classification. 100% agreement of all four reviewers of Modic change presence, Type, and Udby classification was required to be classified as agreement. There were 480 total data points each with 10 unique choices to compare across the four independent reviewers. ResultsThe kappa value of their agreement was 0.5899 (95% CI 0.4860–0.6939). ConclusionThis study, requiring unanimous agreement between 4 physicians in application of the Udby classification, demonstrated an interrater reliability score of 0.5899 (95% CI 0.4860–0.6939). While this figure provides a first estimate, larger scale research is necessary before definitive claims regarding the interrater agreement validity of the Udby characterization system may be made.