Abstract

Urine drug screens (UDS) are widely encountered across medical disciplines, including the cardiovascular subspecialties. The proper interpretation of such a readily available and seemingly simple qualitative test can be more complicated than anticipated. Urine immunoassay tests are limited by false positive and false negative results, which vary by commercial assay and manufacturer. Confirmatory testing can be useful in some specific scenarios but requires specialised toxicology laboratories for sample processing and interpretation. An appreciation for the techniques and limits of UDS will help all clinicians, including cardiovascular specialists, to interpret test results appropriately and steward resources judiciously.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.