Abstract

A recent theory provides a unified cross-linguistic analysis of the interpretations that are assigned to expressions for disjunction, Negative Polarity Items, Free Choice Items, and the non-interrogative uses of wh-phrases in languages such as Mandarin Chinese. If this approach is on the right track, children should be expected to demonstrate similar patterns in the acquisition of these linguistic expressions. Previous research has found that, by age four, children have acquired the knowledge that both the existential indefinite renhe “any” and wh-words in Mandarin Chinese are interpreted as Negative Polarity Items when they are bound by downward entailing operators, but the same expressions are interpreted as Free Choice Items (with a conjunctive interpretation) when they are bound by deontic modals (Mandarin keyi) or by the Mandarin adverbial quantifier dou “all”. The present study extends this line of research to the Mandarin disjunction word huozhe. A Truth Value Judgment Task was used to investigate the possibility that disjunction phrases that are bound by the adverbial quantifier dou generate a conjunctive interpretation in the grammars of Mandarin-speaking 4-year-old children. The findings confirmed this prediction. We discuss the implications of the findings for linguistic theory and for language learnability.

Highlights

  • A theory has been advanced that provides a unified semantic analysis of disjunction, Negative Polarity Items (NPIs), Free Choice Items (FCIs), and the non-interrogative interpretations of wh-phrases across languages (Fox, 2007; Chierchia, 2013)

  • Following Fox (2007), Chierchia (2013), we propose that children initially analyze both wh-words and disjunction as existential items, and know that when wh-words and disjunction occur in the scope of an exhaustification operator, they yield a conjunctive interpretation using the kind of recursive exhaustification algorithm described in the present study

  • A recent proposal by Chierchia (2013) offers a unified analysis of the interpretation assigned to disjunction words, NPIs, FCIs, and the non-interrogative use of wh-phrases in Mandarin Chinese

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A theory has been advanced that provides a unified semantic analysis of disjunction, Negative Polarity Items (NPIs), Free Choice Items (FCIs), and the non-interrogative interpretations of wh-phrases across languages (Fox, 2007; Chierchia, 2013). The present study tests the unification account directly, by asking if Mandarin disjunctive phrases evoke conjunctive inferences when they are bound by the quantificational adverb (hereafter, Q-adverb) dou. This possibility is investigated in an experimental study with Mandarin-speaking children and adults. Three English ∃–items, the existential indefinite some, the disjunction word or, and the polarity sensitive expression any, are illustrated in examples (1) - (4)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call