Abstract

Among the scalar usages of only, there is one that has a temporal dimension. In Carla understood the problem only on Sunday, for instance, Sunday is considered late for Carla to have understood the problem. In this paper, we explore the interpretation and distribution of temporal only along with other focus particles that permit a temporal reading. We focus on the Dutch counterpart of temporal only, pas (see Barbiers 1995). This particle is formally distinct from both exclusive only (alleen) and non-temporal scalar only (maar). We concentrate on two core issues. The first concerns the observation that temporal focus particles systematically support two modes of interpretation, a purely temporal one and a lack-of-progress reading. The latter is found in an example like Billy has only read three books (so far), which implies that three is a low number of books for Billy to have read at the reference time. The second issue concerns ‘Barbiers’s Generalization,’ the requirement that temporal focus particles immediately c-command the category they interact with. We propose a semantic analysis that captures these observations, building on previous work by König (1979, 1981), Löbner (1989), Krifka (2000) and Klinedinst (2004), among others.

Highlights

  • The focus particle only permits at least three readings

  • The aim of this paper is to develop a semantic analysis of temporal focus particles that unifies their various usages and that at the same time provides the basis for an analysis of their syntactic distribution

  • We show that the semantics of the focus particles does not need to be adjusted to deal with these cases, but that it is necessary to develop a proposal that allows nontemporal expressions to assume an additional temporal reading

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The focus particle only permits at least three readings. Perhaps the best known one is the exclusive reading (see Horn 1969; Rooth 1985; König 1991, among others). (2a) has an exclusive reading and alleen must be used; (2b) has a nontemporal scalar reading and maar must be used; and (2c) has a temporal reading, so that pas must be used. As discussed by König (1979, 1981), temporal focus particles can give rise to a reading that indicates a high or a low degree of progress, for example when they appear in the context of numerals. König demonstrates this for German erst, but the same is true of Dutch pas (see Barbiers 1995).

Temporal only
A typology of temporal focus particles
Articulated scales and two-point scales
Interpretation in the temporal mode
Deriving Barbiers’s Generalization
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.