Abstract
This paper is aimed at looking critically at the interplay between the status planning and acquisition planning in the Peace Corps/Korea TEFL Program conducted in Korea from 1966 till 1981. In the case of English in Korea, it is modernization that should be added to Hornberger’s (2006) existing policy goals of status planning such as officialization, nationalization etc. As such, modernization was accepted by both the U.S. and Korea as a keyword of the program particularly in accordance with the modernization theory fully-fledged during the 1950s and 1960s. As far as the concept of modernization is concerned, however, it is pointed out that the U.S. was more interested in a sweeping societal change of Korea in its nation-building process, whereas Korea was more concerned with its economic development in terms of Peace Corps’ newly introduced English education. The dichotomy in Language Planning and Policy (LPP) between the two macro-institutions gave rise to a few major controversies or conflict of interests between the Peace Corps/Korea and the Korean schools, ending in de facto only a status quo of English education in Korea, despite PCVs’ far-reaching audio-lingual oriented emphasis on spoken English.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: The Journal of Mirae English Language and Literature
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.