Abstract
In examining the implications of the advisory opinion, this article structures its arguments around four issues: firstly, the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice; secondly, the functions of the General Assembly and the Security Council; thirdly, the content of general and specific international law; and last but not least, the scope of the right of self determination. The article then proceeds to evaluate the weaknesses of the advisory opinion issued by the International Court of Justice and attempts to reach a better understanding of it. The article finally concludes by recommending that the significance of the advisory opinion be confined in light of the flaws in its reasoning.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
