Abstract
Education systems usually fall into two main types: the Continental and Atlantic systems of education. Countriesbelonging to the third world often follow after the characteristics of the continental system, however, thespecificities of the country may overwrite some characteristics of the original concept. This article aims tointroduce some specific aspects of the educational systems of Iran, Ethiopia and Myanmar through thecomparison of these systems. According to the data analysis, centralisation is relevant, but decentralisationtends to be strengthened in each country. Concerning their structure, similarities in the division of levels wereidentified, along with differences in duration and focus. Unsurprisingly, the curriculums are different in eachcountry; however, the basic subjects are almost the same. Finally, the grading systems use similar categories,although the underlying points providing the basis for the grades significantly differ. Comparing them cancontribute to their evaluation and further development.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.