Abstract
AbstractThe chapter considers the role played by the International Arctic Science Committee (IASC) within the concept of science diplomacy. It is argued that states still dominate Arctic science diplomacy as an area of regional governance, and non-state actors like IASC are playing only secondary or even utilitarian roles. Nevertheless, it is shown how IASC is consequently developing its potential and trying to respond to the global interests in the region and the increasing demand for scientific knowledge related to the changing Arctic. This study suggests that the non-state actors in the Arctic region are becoming more effective, flexible and often better prepared to respond to specific, sectoral or sub-regional needs, which in times of climate change assure them an important position and promising perspective for the future.KeywordsArctic governanceScience diplomacyInternational Arctic Science CommitteeResearch policySoft-power
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
