Abstract

Human cognitive functioning shows circadian variations throughout the day. However, individuals largely differ in their timing during the day of when they are more capable of performing specific tasks and when they prefer to sleep. These interindividual differences in preferred temporal organization of sleep and daytime activities define the chronotype. Since a late chronotype is associated with adverse mental and physical consequences, it is of vital importance to study how lighting environments affect chronotype. Here, we use a mathematical model of the human circadian pacemaker to understand how light in the built environment changes the chronotype distribution in the population. In line with experimental findings, we show that when individuals spend their days in relatively dim light conditions, this not only results in a later phase of their biological clock but also increases interindividual differences in circadian phase angle of entrainment and preferred sleep timing. Increasing daytime illuminance results in a more narrow distribution of sleep timing and circadian phase, and this effect is more pronounced for longer photoperiods. The model results demonstrate that modern lifestyle changes the chronotype distribution towards more eveningness and more extreme differences in eveningness. Such model-based predictions can be used to design guidelines for workplace lighting that help limiting circadian phase differences, and craft new lighting strategies that support human performance, health and wellbeing.

Highlights

  • Human cognitive functioning shows circadian variations throughout the day

  • The phase difference established between a marker of an individual’s circadian rhythm and the entraining zeitgeber cycle is known as entrainment phase (ψ)

  • Genetic variation in the PER1 and PER3 period genes is associated with ­chronotype[5,6], while the PER2 gene is associated with the intrinsic circadian period in humans and this variation in intrinsic circadian periods influences morning and evening p­ references[7]; people with a longer circadian period tend to be later chronotypes while people with a shorter period tend to be earlier chronotypes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Individuals largely differ in their timing during the day of when they are more capable of performing specific tasks and when they prefer to sleep These interindividual differences in preferred temporal organization of sleep and daytime activities define the chronotype. In line with experimental findings, we show that when individuals spend their days in relatively dim light conditions, this results in a later phase of their biological clock and increases interindividual differences in circadian phase angle of entrainment and preferred sleep timing. Wright et al.[21], showed that a week of camping outdoors in summer under only natural light conditions advanced circadian phase and reduced circadian phase variability in a group of eight individuals Their habitual luminous exposure patterns (i.e., when living in conditions with electric light) could be characterized as that of a weak and temporally confusing zeitgeber. Understanding the mechanisms of human light entrainment is increasingly important for the development of lighting control systems that may reduce the numerous pathophysiological repercussions induced by chrono-disruption[22,23]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call