Abstract

Summary Given the recent discussions about the proper stance of the American Psychological Association vis-a-vis a wide range of moral issues, it might be useful to reflect upon the historical foundations of contemporary psychology. This article reviews this history from the seventeenth century to the present, placing special emphasis upon the role that moral concerns played in the development of all the modern sciences of man, including psychology. It presents evidence in support of the thesis that the intentions or concerns of Descartes and Locke were largely moral and that similar intentions underlay the work of virtually all of the subsequent proponents of “the science of Man” up to the turn of the twentieth century. It then discusses the twentieth-century conflict between this heritage of moral concern and the ideal of a “value-free,” logically “justified,” and “pure” science of psychology. While acknowledging the lively debate surrounding this conflict, it argues that the conflict itself is more app...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.