Abstract
Safety pharmacology screening against a wide range of unintended vital targets using in vitro assays is crucial to understand off-target interactions with drug candidates. With the increasing demand for in vitro assays, ligand- and structure-based virtual screening approaches have been evaluated for potential utilization in safety profiling. Although ligand based approaches have been actively applied in retrospective analysis or prospectively within well-defined chemical space during the early discovery stage (i.e., HTS screening and lead optimization), virtual screening is rarely implemented in later stage of drug discovery (i.e., safety). Here we present a case study to evaluate ligand-based 3D QSAR models built based on in vitro antagonistic activity data against adenosine receptor 2A (A2A). The resulting models, obtained from 268 chemically diverse compounds, were used to test a set of 1,897 chemically distinct drugs, simulating the real-world challenge of safety screening when presented with novel chemistry and a limited training set. Due to the unique requirements of safety screening versus discovery screening, the limitations of 3D QSAR methods (i.e., chemotypes, dependence on large training set, and prone to false positives) are less critical than early discovery screen. We demonstrated that 3D QSAR modeling can be effectively applied in safety assessment prior to in vitro assays, even with chemotypes that are drastically different from training compounds. It is also worth noting that our model is able to adequately make the mechanistic distinction between agonists and antagonists, which is important to inform subsequent in vivo studies. Overall, we present an in-depth analysis of the appropriate utilization and interpretation of pharmacophore-based 3D QSAR models for safety screening.
Highlights
Safety profiling against a wide range of molecular off-targets, prior to in vivo toxicity testing with animal models, has been widely implemented across the pharmaceutical industry [1,2,3,4,5]
We present here a case study to evaluate the utilization of 3D quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) modeling as a part of integrated approach to support safety profiling
The 268 compounds, from public sources and in-house, were divided into training and test sets via 3 approaches as illustrated in Fig 1, as QSAR outcome might be affected by how training and test sets were separated [40,49]
Summary
Safety profiling against a wide range of molecular off-targets, prior to in vivo toxicity testing with animal models, has been widely implemented across the pharmaceutical industry [1,2,3,4,5]. Such a “bottom-up-approach” [6,7] reflects a continuous effort for a paradigm shift in early safety evaluations [8]. As complementary approaches to help improve the utilization of in vitro HTS assays, tools such as ligand- and structure-based virtual screening have been evaluated. If molecules with undesirable properties can be ruled out using in silico approaches, such as virtual screening, significant resources can be saved where only “prescreened” molecules are advanced to more costly in vitro screens
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.