Abstract
The World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute settlement system has begun to enforce accession commitments without a systematic analysis of the relationship between accession protocols and the WTO agreements. The Appellate Body has twice made recommendations as if a protocol of accession were a separate covered agreement under the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) when, manifestly, it is not. This approach can affect the interpretation of the accession protocols, notably as regards the availability of general exceptions. Even if it is agreed that an accession protocol is 'an integral part of the WTO Agreement', that statement needs to be analysed and not merely recited. It is a pivotal clause which expressly addresses the relationship between an accession protocol and the WTO Agreement and therefore provides an interpretative framework for the assessment of claims arising under accession commitments. Analysis of that clause in its context reveals that it provides for an accession protocol to be read together with the WTO Agreement as a whole, including the multilateral trade agreements, such as GATT 1994.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.