Abstract
The defect resulting from the lack of jurisdiction is regarded as a means to cancel an administrative decision for such the jurisdiction represents the cornerstone among the administrative law systems. Therefore, each authority is named to authority to exercise its jurisdiction according to the bylaws and regulations stipulated by the state. Despite the fact that there have been other defects to influence the legitimacy of the administrative decision, the lack of jurisdiction defect has still been the sole significant shortcoming affecting the public order.
Highlights
The defect resulting from the lack of jurisdiction is regarded as a means to cancel an administrative decision for such the jurisdiction represents the cornerstone among the administrative law systems
2) The Jurisprudence and judiciary has pointed out two categories of lack of jurisdiction, which are: The simple lack of jurisdiction seeking the abuse of authority; and the complex lack of jurisdiction called the authority usurpation
3) The Jordanian judiciary system states the possibility of correcting the administrative decision which us exposed to the lack of jurisdiction defect once it is rightly by an exclusive jurisdiction
Summary
The defect resulting from the lack of jurisdiction is regarded as a means to cancel an administrative decision for such the jurisdiction represents the cornerstone among the administrative law systems. Each authority is named to authority to exercise its jurisdiction according to the bylaws and regulations stipulated by the state. Despite the fact that there have been other defects to influence the legitimacy of the administrative decision, the lack of jurisdiction defect has still been the sole significant shortcoming affecting the public order
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
