Abstract

Questions remain regarding the use of the cephalosporins to treat infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli. For example, should ceftazidime or cefepime be used to treat infections with CTX-M ESBL-producing organisms with low MICs (minimum inhibitory concentrations), according to the new Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institutes (CLSI) recommendations for susceptibility testing? Some studies have reported that in vitro MICs of cephalosporins increase as the inoculum increases, which is the inoculum effect; however, most of the enzymes studied were SHV and TEM. In this study, we aimed to investigate the inoculum effect on ceftazidime, cefepime and four other lactam agents against CTX-M-ESBLs-producing Escherichia coli. Antibiotic susceptibilities were determined using broth microdilution MIC methodology according to the CLSI recommended with standard and 100-fold-higher inocula. An inoculum effect on meropenem and cefminox was not detected. The size of the inoculum affected piperacillin/tazobactam activity against only 4 strains, all CTX-M-14 genotypes. The inoculum size affected the activity of ceftazidime, cefepime and cefotaxime against 35%, 85%, 100% of strains, respectively. Among the strains with an inoculum effect, CTX-M-14 was the most common ESBL genotype. These findings suggest that meropenem is the most active compound against serious infections caused by Escherichia coli producing ESBLs. Cefminox and piperacillin-tazobactam exhibit strong activity against many strains. Until further studies are performed, clinicians should be aware that third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins (such as ceftazidime and cefepime) are not reliable for serious infections even though in vitro tests indicate susceptibility.

Highlights

  • The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) has revised susceptibility breakpoints for Enterobacteriaceae and recommendations for testing for extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) production, and recommends reporting the Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of cephalosporins, but not the production of ESBLs [1]

  • An inoculum effect on piperacillin/tazobactam was observed in only 4 strains, all genotype CTX-M-14

  • In tests of CTX-M-ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolates, meropenem and cefminox were less influenced by inoculum size

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The CLSI has revised susceptibility breakpoints for Enterobacteriaceae and recommendations for testing for ESBL production, and recommends reporting the MICs of cephalosporins, but not the production of ESBLs [1]. Many ESBL-producing Escherichia coli may be reported susceptible to ceftazidime or cefepime, especially those producing CTX-M-ESBL, which are apt to hydrolyze cefotaxime [2]. Clinical correlations other four kinds of β–lactam agents against CTX-MESBL-producing Escherichia coli. Questions remain regarding the use of the cephalosporins to treat infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli. Should ceftazidime or cefepime be used to treat infections with CTX-M ESBL-producing organisms with low MICs (minimum inhibitory concentrations), according to the new Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute’s (CLSI) recommendations for susceptibility testing? We aimed to investigate the inoculum effect on ceftazidime, cefepime and four other β–lactam agents against CTX-M-ESBLs-producing Escherichia coli

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call