Abstract

In this paper we measure the evolution of adhesion between two polycrystalline silicon sidewalls of a microelectromechanical adhesion sensor during three million contact cycles. We execute a series of AFM-like contact force measurements with comparable force resolution, but using real MEMS multi-asperity sidewall contacts mimicking conditions in real devices. Adhesion forces are measured with a very high sub-nanonewton resolution using a recently developed optical displacement measurement method. Measurements are performed under well-defined, but different, low relative humidity conditions. We found three regimes in the evolution of the adhesion force. (I) Initial run-in with a large of cycle-to-cycle variability, (II) Stability with low variability, and (III) device-dependent long term drift. The results obtained demonstrate that although a short run-in measurement shows stabilization, this is no guarantee for long-term stable behavior. Devices performing similarly in region II, can drift very differently afterwards. The adhesion force drift during millions of cycles is comparable in magnitude to the adhesion force drift during initial run-in. The boundaries of the drifting adhesion forces are reasonably well described by an empirical model based on random walk statistics. This is useful knowledge when designing polycrystalline silicon MEMS with contacting surfaces.

Highlights

  • The contact mechanics of micro electromechanical systems (MEMS) is a topic of increasing interest

  • For the major a part of the MEMS devices currently on the market, contact mechanics plays no role, because the devices are designed such that no moving components are required to touch each other

  • Each experiment yielded a total number of 1000 contact cycles, which amounts to a total of 6000 contact cycles, each consisting of 2000 pictures

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The contact mechanics of micro electromechanical systems (MEMS) is a topic of increasing interest. For the major a part of the MEMS devices currently on the market, contact mechanics plays no role, because the devices are designed such that no moving components are required to touch each other. Even in these devices some parts may occasionally come into contact when they are subjected to impact accelerations. Our understanding of so-called ‘mesoscale’ contact mechanics: the domain where the number of contact points, or asperities between two contacting surfaces is larger that one (atomic scale) but not ‘close to infinity’ (macroscale), is lagging behind

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.